| ID | 148500 |
| Title Proper | China’s nine-dash line, international law, and the Monroe Doctrine analogy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Scott, Shirley V |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | John Mearsheimer has compared China’s attitude towards the South China Sea to the Monroe Doctrine of the United States. Mearsheimer does not accord international law much weight and certainly does not regard it as determinative of political outcomes. But many observers of China’s disputes in the South China Sea look to international law for rules and processes that could facilitate peaceful resolution of the disputes. In doing so they are variously puzzled, bemused, and/or angered by China’s assertion of the nine-dash line (南海九段线). This article draws more broadly on the literature on the Monroe Doctrine, viewing the doctrine as: a unilateral pronouncement of foreign policy; representing resistance; embedded in domestic as opposed to international law; and an assertion of legitimate regional hegemony. Through applying the analogy of the Monroe Doctrine, the article seeks fresh insights into China’s legal position in relation to the South China Sea and into the significance of the nine-dash line in terms of international law. |
| `In' analytical Note | China Information Vol. 30, No.3; Nov 2016: p.296-311 |
| Journal Source | China Information 2016-12 30, 3 |
| Key Words | Monroe doctrine ; South China Sea ; Law of The Sea ; Arbitration ; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ; The Rise of China ; International Law ; Nine-Dash Line |