Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1238Hits:21500596Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID148523
Title ProperSouth China Sea arbitration (the Philippines v. China)
Other Title Informationassessment of the award on jurisdiction and admissibility
LanguageENG
AuthorPemmaraju, Sreenivasa Rao
Summary / Abstract (Note)China claims “historic rights” over the islands and other maritime features in the South China Sea. The Philippines contests these claims on the ground that they are incompatible with the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea. It initiated arbitration under Annex VII of the (UNCLOS) for a declaratory judgment to that effect. China rejected the arbitral procedure in part because of its 2006 Declaration which excludes all such disputes from the compulsory dispute settlement procedure of the Convention. This paper examines the recent award of the Arbitral Tribunal accepting jurisdiction over the some of the submissions made by the Philippines. It finds that the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea has very little to offer to decide on issues of sovereignty and associated issues of overlapping maritime entitlements.
`In' analytical NoteChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 15, No.2; Jun 2016: p.265-307
Journal SourceChinese Journal of International Law Vol: 15 No 2
Key WordsJurisdiction ;  Philippines V. China ;  South China Sea Arbitration ;  Admissibility


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text