Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2682Hits:21027147Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID148526
Title ProperExpansions and restrictions in the UNCLOS dispute settlement regime
Other Title Informationlessons from recent decisions
LanguageENG
AuthorKlein, Natalie
Summary / Abstract (Note)Recent decisions under the UNCLOS dispute settlement regime, such as Chagos Archipelago, Arctic Sunrise and South China Sea, have had cause to consider the parameters of jurisdiction that exists under Part XV of UNCLOS. A determination of jurisdiction for any court or tribunal constituted under UNCLOS must have regard to alternative means of dispute settlement available, whether the dispute is one relating to the interpretation or application of UNCLOS and whether any exceptions to jurisdiction apply. This paper will consider these three dimensions in light of recent decisions and reflect on ways that the scope of jurisdiction is being expanded or restricted to resolve the disputes at issue.
`In' analytical NoteChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 15, No.2; Jun 2016: p.403-415
Journal SourceChinese Journal of International Law Vol: 15 No 2
Key WordsUnclos ;  Restrictions ;  Expansions ;  Dispute Settlement Regime


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text