Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:3997Hits:20963230Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID149293
Title ProperWhy do analysts use structured analytic techniques? an in-depth study of an American intelligence agency
LanguageENG
AuthorCoulthart, Stephen
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article presents findings from the first publicly available survey generalizable to an intelligence agency to explore why analysts use structured analytic techniques (SATs). Mandated by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (2004), SATs are simple methodologies supposed to make analysis more transparent and, hopefully, valid. Despite the US government’s investment in training thousands of analysts, there is no solid evidence on how often or why analysts actually use SATs. A survey of 80 analysts and nine follow-up interviews at the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research reveals a simple, but important, truth: implementing the techniques requires training and compelling evidence they will improve analysis. Other factors, most notably the amount of time pressure an analyst experiences, were not significantly related with the use of the techniques despite anecdotal accounts and conjecture from the literature. Future research should examine other intelligence agencies to cross-validate these findings. If these findings hold in other cases, intelligence agencies should focus on reforming and incorporating evidence into the training process.
`In' analytical NoteIntelligence and National Security Vol. 31, No.7; Dec 2016: p.933-948
Journal SourceIntelligence and National Security Vol: 31 No 7
Key WordsStructured Analytic Techniques ;  American Intelligence Agency


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text