Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1917Hits:21574186Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID150030
Title ProperLow cost of quality improvements in the electricity distribution sector of Brazil
LanguageENG
AuthorCorton, Maria Luisa ;  Zimmermann, Aneliese ;  Phillips, Michelle Andrea
Summary / Abstract (Note)We analyze the impact of introducing output-based incentives in the price-cap regulatory regime of the Brazilian electricity distribution sector. We focus on the trade-off between operating costs and quality improvement, hypothesizing a positive relationship. Operating costs include maintenance and repair expenses. The regulator sets limits for service continuity and non-technical energy losses in each regulatory period. Service continuity refers to the average length of interruptions in electricity distribution. Non-technical losses refer to losses due to factors specific to the distribution segment. Quality incentives include peer-pressure and penalties/rewards for compliance with minimum quality standards. We model operating costs using a GMM framework to acknowledge endogeneity of variables. The model is dynamic given the inclusion of regulatory lags to recognize past cost behavior. Findings reveal a small trade-off between costs and quality. We conclude that quality improvements are not costly relative to the potential savings from complying with quality standards. We also find that the impact on operating costs is larger when energy losses increase compared to the cost effect due to increases in duration of outages. These findings suggest areas of attention in managerial decision making, and serve as valuable information to the regulator in tailoring quality incentives for this sector.
`In' analytical NoteEnergy Policy Vol. 97, No.97; Oct 2016: p. 485–493
Journal SourceEnergy Policy 2016-10 97, 97
Key WordsGMM Estimation ;  Quality Regulation ;  Stakeholder Feedback ;  Dynamic Cost Model