| ID | 152707 |
| Title Proper | Polarity analysis and collective perceptions of power |
| Other Title Information | the need for a new approach |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Zala, Benjamin |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The literature on the current global order is confused over its polarity. Depictions of a current multipolarity are found alongside discussions of the longevity of US-led unipolarity, while others point to the early stages of US–Sino-dominated bipolarity. These competing visions of the interstate order sit uneasily within the existing literature that both defines polarity in terms of the distribution of material capabilities and makes system-level predictions based on the assumption that all actors perceive polarity objectively. This article outlines the need for a more analytically eclectic understanding of polarity. Exploring the possibilities of a deeper engagement between the realist literature on structural power and the constructivist literature on perception, agency, and performativity, it puts forward a redefinition of polarity in which perceptions of status replace a focus on the distribution of capabilities. An analysis of the Cold War period—normally depicted as a clear case of unbroken bipolarity—demonstrates the usefulness of this reconceptualization. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Global security Studies Vol. 2, No.1; Jan 2017: p.2-17 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Global security Studies Vol: 2 No 1 |
| Key Words | Realism ; Great Powers ; Constructivism ; Perception ; Polarity |