Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1766Hits:21370515Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID152770
Title ProperEvaluation of scientific evidence by international courts and tribunals in the continental shelf delimitation cases
LanguageENG
AuthorLiao, Xuexia
Summary / Abstract (Note)Evaluation of scientific evidence is one of the challenges arising in the tribunal and court cases that deal with the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles (nm). Given the difficulties rooted in the interface between law and science regarding the establishment of the entitlement to the continental shelf beyond 200 nm, the current judicial practice offers limited guidance in enhancing transparency and openness in evaluating the scientific evidence. Utilizing procedures providing for the assistance of experts is advisable, as this could facilitate the achievement of an equitable solution in the cases.
`In' analytical NoteOcean Development and International Law Vol. 48, No.2; Apr-Jun 2017: p.136-157
Journal SourceOcean Development and International Law Vol: 48 No 2
Key WordsContinental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles ;  International Courts and Tribunals ;  Scientific Evidence


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text