| ID | 153025 |
| Title Proper | Controversial identity of a rising China |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pu, Xiaoyu |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | How a rising power adapts to its new status is an important challenge in international relations. Since the global financial crisis, Chinese scholars have hotly debated China’s international positioning. The ongoing debate reveals a high level of uncertainty about China’s position in the world. While the notion of the ‘revival of the Chinese nation’ implies the clear goal of ‘making China great again’, China’s ultimate place on the global stage is unclear. Many Chinese scholars might want China to become richer and stronger, but disagree on whether or not China should eventually seek superpower status. Regarding strategies, Chinese scholars also debate whether China should maintain a low profile or strive for greater achievements in global affairs. This article takes a ‘status signalling’ approach to explain why Chinese scholars take various positions in this debate. Status signalling aims either to change or maintain a special type of ‘status belief’ among relevant political actors. China must manage its conflicting roles in ways that advance its interests but do not engender dangerous misperceptions. In particular, China must balance the competing incentives between resolve and reassurance, status and responsibilities, and the domestic and international audience. These competing incentives have shaped the Chinese debate on international positioning. |
| `In' analytical Note | Chinese Journal of International Politics Vol. 10, No.2; Summer 2017: p.131–149 |
| Journal Source | Chinese Journal of International Politics Vol: 10 No 2 |
| Key Words | Rising China ; Controversial Identity |