| ID | 153181 |
| Title Proper | Atomic leverage |
| Other Title Information | compellence with nuclear latency |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Volpe, Tristan A |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Nuclear proliferation is not a binary outcome with uniform consequences, but instead spans a continuum of latent capacity to produce nuclear weapons. At various thresholds of technical development, some countries leverage nuclear latency to practice coercive diplomacy. How and when does nuclear technology provide a challenger with the most effective means to extract concessions in world politics? This article claims that compellence with nuclear latency puts a challenger on the horns of a credibility dilemma between demonstrating resolve and signaling restraint, and identifies a sweet spot for reaching an optimal bargain where the proliferation threat is credible while the assurance costs of revealing intent are low. Historical studies of South Korea, Japan, and North Korea validate this Goldilocks principle and find that it consistently reflects the ability to produce fissile material. Contrary to conventional wisdom about proliferation, nuclear technology generates political effects long before a country acquires nuclear weapons. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 26, No.3; Jul-Sep 2017: p.517-544 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol: 26 No 3 |
| Key Words | Compellence ; Nuclear Latency ; Atomic Leverage |