ID | 153301 |
Title Proper | Grammar schools, a policy of social mobility and selection—why? |
Language | ENG |
Author | Ware, Alan |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Initially, four plausible reasons for introducing selection in secondary education are examined, three of which are irrelevant to contemporary debates about expanding grammar-school education. These are: first, to ration education in less advanced economies; second, to increase the supply of skilled labour within an expanded national elite; third, as part of a ‘segmented’ system of education. A fourth—increasing upward social mobility—is open to two objections: first, the May government's proposals are so limited as to have little likely impact on mobility and, second, upward mobility in the twentieth century was possible only because of structural change in the British labour market, and that will probably not continue in this century. Finally, it is argued that attempts to select the ‘best’ in any activity or skill are necessarily highly imperfect, and are far less accurate than testing who does and does not meet some minimum level of competence. |
`In' analytical Note | Political Quarterly Vol. 88, No.2; Apr-Jun 2017: p.280–290 |
Journal Source | Political Quarterly 2017-06 88, 2 |
Key Words | Testing ; Meritocracy ; Competence ; Selection ; Social Mobality ; Grammar Schools |