| ID | 156162 |
| Title Proper | Rhetorical adaptation and resistance to international norms |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Dixon, Jennifer M |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Scholarship on states’ responses to international norms has focused on commitment, compliance, and noncompliance; paying insufficient attention to responses that fall outside these categories. Beyond simply complying with or violating a norm; states contest, resist, and respond to international norms in a range of ways. I identify rhetorical adaptation as a central form of resistance to international norms. Rather than simply rejecting a norm or charges of norm violation, such a strategy draws on a norm’s content to resist pressures for compliance or minimize perceptions of violation. Theorizing the relationship between norms’ content and states’ resistant rhetoric, I identify four types of rhetorical adaptation: norm disregard, norm avoidance, norm interpretation, and norm signaling. To probe the plausibility of these propositions, a case study of Turkey’s post-World War II narrative of the Armenian Genocide traces a sequence of rhetorical adaptations over the past six decades. Building on the case study, I then draw out generalizable insights into the uses and effects of rhetorical adaptation. Connecting theoretical concerns in political science with the interdisciplinary fields of genocide studies and memory studies, I delineate the ways in which actors instrumentally use norms and expand understandings of the forms and effects of so-called norm takers’ agency. |
| `In' analytical Note | Perspectives on Politics Vol. 15, No.1; Mar 2017: p.83-99 |
| Journal Source | Perspectives on Politics 2017-03 15, 1 |
| Key Words | Resistance ; International Norms ; Rhetorical Adaptation |