Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1076Hits:21530372Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID158063
Title ProperRenunciation of minority rights and the making of the 1926 civil law
Other Title InformationMahzars penned by non-Muslim minorities
LanguageENG
AuthorKeskinkılıç, Erdoğan ;  Açıkgöz, Betül
Summary / Abstract (Note)Civil rights of the minorities, substantially framed in the Lausanne Peace Treaty in 1923, were subjected to secular regulation with the Civil Code issued in 1926 in Turkey. The annulment of the Lausanne provisions was justified with collective petitions penned by representatives of the non-Muslim communities. The collective petitions, called ‘mahzar’, constituted the legal pretext by which the non-Muslim communities were reconciled with the secularizing civil code of government. This article unravels the manuscripts of ‘mahzars’ and sheds light on the political backdrop whereby non-Muslim minorities renounced their rights in Article 42. Drawing on the scripts of mahzars, it tracks the justification and arguments made by the disclaimers of non-Muslim communities. It also delineates the debate on the act of renunciation by examining the transcripts of the negotiations at Lausanne Peace Conference and the internal and international press. Despite standing for the consent of the non-Muslim minorities, the collective petitions, this article argues, embodied hegemonic means of government to subdue minority rights.
`In' analytical NoteMiddle Eastern Studies Vol. 54, No.1; Jan 2018: p.68-93
Journal SourceMiddle Eastern Studies Vol: 54 No 1
Key WordsCivil Law ;  Non- Muslim Minoritie ;  Mahzar ;  Lausanne Peace Treaty ;  Renunciation Of Minority Rights


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text