| ID | 159011 |
| Title Proper | de Bunsen Committee and a revision of the ‘conspiracy’ of Sykes–Picot |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Johnson, Robert |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The Sykes–Picot The Sykes-Picot Agreement is often cited as evidence of a Western conspiracy to carve up the Middle East and subordinate the Arabs. It is a prevalent view across the region, and has been a refrain repeated by critics. Yet very little is known of the far more significant conclusions of a Committee, formed by Maurice de Bunsen on the orders of the British government, which ascertained the options open to the Allies in 1915. Far from a nefarious conspiracy, the Committee came down in favour of a decentralised, ultimately independent region. The First World War compelled some revision of the original intent, but the essence of the Committee's conclusions remained intact throughout the war, and after. Conversely, Sir Mark Sykes repudiated the ‘agreement’ he had made with the French diplomat Picot, and substantial revisions were made to that temporary scheme. Yet it seems that ‘conspiracy sells’, and generations have colluded with the theme of perfidy to reinforce particular narratives, including, most recently, the Da´esh movement's claim to have ‘ended Sykes-Picot’. |
| `In' analytical Note | Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 54, No.4; Jul 2018: p.611-637 |
| Journal Source | Middle Eastern Studies Vol: 54 No 4 |
| Key Words | Balfour ; Sykes–Picot ; Bunsen ; Hussein–McMahon |