Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1048Hits:24739363Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID159053
Title ProperPicking ‘winners' in China
Other Title Informationdo subsidies matter for indigenous innovation and firm productivity?
LanguageENG
AuthorHowell, Anthony
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper examines the effects of public subsidies across several dimensions of the innovation process and the implications for productivity. As an identification strategy, panel data is used to estimate a structural innovation model that controls for unobserved heterogeneity combined with matching techniques that help ensure comparability between subsidized and non-subsidized firms. The findings reveal that public subsidies reduce firms' economic performance in lower and higher technology industries despite promoting indigenous innovation in the higher technology industries. Policymakers may tolerate lower average efficiency if they expect that some of the state-backed firms will eventually become successful innovators that go on to generate significantly large social welfare payoffs. Although the findings do not support such an expectation, thus bringing into question whether the social payoff from China's so-called picking ‘winners' strategy justifies the cost.
`In' analytical NoteChina Economic Review Vol. 44; Jul 2017: p.154-165
Journal SourceChina Economic Review 2017-07
Key WordsR&D ;  China ;  Innovation ;  TFP ;  Picking Winners ;  State Subsidies