| ID | 160338 |
| Title Proper | Is the Good News About Law Compliance Good News About Norm Compliance? the Case of Racial Equality |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Búzás, Zoltán I |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The most important international human rights norms are legalized or codified in international treaty law. Yet pernicious practices at odds with these norms endure and sometimes even increase after legalization. According to conventional wisdom, this is because agents commit to but do not comply with international law and the underlying norms. I develop a theory of evasion to explain why norm violations persist even when states technically comply with the law. Because legalization transposes social norms into international law imperfectly, it creates gaps between laws and underlying norms. Because of these norm-law gaps, legality and normative appropriateness will diverge. States caught between opposing pressures from pro-violation and pro-compliance groups exploit this gap through what I call evasion—the intentional minimization of normative obligations that technically complies with international law but violates underlying norms. I demonstrate the theory's empirical purchase in the cases of the French expulsion of Roma immigrants and the Czech school segregation of Roma children. Under the cover of technical compliance with the law, these states violated the norm of racial equality. The argument cautions that the good news about law compliance is not necessarily good news about norm compliance, broadens our understanding of norm violators' agency, and has practical implications for human rights advocacy. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Organization Vol. 72, No.2; Spring 2018: p.351-385 |
| Journal Source | International Organization Vol: 72 No 2 |
| Key Words | Law Compliance ; Racial Equality |