| ID | 160722 |
| Title Proper | Tradeoffs in defense strategic planning |
| Other Title Information | lessons from the U.S. Quadrennial Defense Review |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Tama, Jordan |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Defense ministries conduct strategic planning in various ways. In this article I outline tradeoffs in the design of strategic planning processes, and consider the implications of these tradeoffs for choices about the conduct of defense planning in different circumstances. Whereas an inclusive and transparent planning process is well-suited to building internal and external buy-in for a defense strategy, a more exclusive and opaque process is more likely to generate a defense strategy that departs from the status quo and speaks candidly about key challenges. The design of a defense planning process should therefore be informed by certain features of its context, such as whether the international security environment is stable or in flux and whether the defense ministry enjoys or lacks strong political support. I base the article’s findings on an in-depth analysis of the U.S. Quadrennial Defense Review, which served for nearly two decades as the major strategy process of the U.S. Department of Defense. This analysis draws on interviews I conducted of 23 defense officials and experts, as well as primary and secondary sources. More generally, my findings highlight for scholars and practitioners the importance of understanding how planning processes can shape defense and national security policies. |
| `In' analytical Note | Defence Studies Vol. 18, No.3; Sep 2018: p.279-301 |
| Journal Source | Defence Studies Vol: 18 No 3 |
| Key Words | National Security ; Strategic Planning ; Defense ; Participation ; Transparency ; Strategy |