| ID | 160742 |
| Title Proper | Is International Relations a Global Discipline? Hegemony, Insularity, and Diversity in the Field |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Maliniak, Daniel |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Using data from the Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) project, we address several questions posed by students of the international relations (IR) discipline, specifically, whether and to what extent: US scholars, institutions, and journals dominate the field; national communities of IR scholars are insular or inward-looking; and/or the discipline is theoretically, methodologically, and epistemologically diverse. We draw from two major data sources: a series of cross-national surveys of IR faculty in thirty-two countries and a database of journal articles published in the twelve leading IR journals from 1980 to 2014. We find obvious signs of US hegemony and insularity. Other national IR communities are relatively open to foreign ideas, if not to hiring scholars trained in other countries. Finally, despite US hegemony in the discipline and pockets of geographic insularity, we see a diverse field characterized by a wide range of theoretical, methodological, and epistemological commitments. We conclude with a discussion on the sources and consequences of diversity in the international relations discipline. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 27, No.3; Jul-Sep 2018: p.448-484 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol: 27 No 3 |
| Key Words | Hegemony ; Diversity ; International Relations ; Global Discipline ; Insularity |