Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:4050Hits:20927013Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID161592
Title ProperGrey networks
Other Title Informationthe contradictory dimensions of Australia's immigration detention system
LanguageENG
AuthorDavid Neil Michelle Peterie ;  Neil, David ;  Peterie, Michelle
Summary / Abstract (Note)The notion of dark networks has recently received attention in the literature on policy network analysis. Dark networks are defined as illegal and covert, in contrast to bright networks which are legal and overt. In this article, we suggest a third category – grey networks – which are characterised by their use of secrecy and concealment despite their ostensibly legal status. These networks are subject to contradictory imperatives. They employ methods that cannot be openly acknowledged within the larger legal and social framework in which they function. In this article, we illustrate this concept through an interview‐based study of Australia's immigration detention network. This network enacts a deterrence policy which has been widely condemned as breaching Australia's obligations under international law. At the same time, it is required to maintain a façade of lawfulness and respect for human rights.
`In' analytical NoteAsia Pacific Viewpoint Vol. 59, No.1; Apr 2018: p.132–144
Journal SourceAsia Pacific Viewpoint 2018-04 59, 1
Key WordsHuman Rights ;  Australia ;  Refugee ;  Immigration Policy ;  Asylum Seeker ;  Mandatory Detention