Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:550Hits:21059529Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID161738
Title ProperExploring the microfoundations of the gender equality peace hypothesis
LanguageENG
AuthorReed Wood Mark D Ramirez ;  Wood, Reed ;  Ramirez, Mark D
Summary / Abstract (Note)Previous studies suggest that patriarchal structures and rigid gender hierarchies at the societal level increase a country’s propensity for involvement in violent social and political conflict. While examining macrolevel predictors and outcomes, the arguments put forth in these studies rely heavily on theories linking individuals’ attitudes toward gender equality to individuals’ beliefs in the appropriateness of violence as a means of attaining political or social objectives. In this research, we explore the microfoundations of the gender equality–peace thesis by examining the conditional impact of beliefs about gender egalitarianism on support for the use of force to achieve foreign policy objectives. Using data from a nationally representative survey of US citizens, we find that as the strength of gender egalitarian attitudes increases, respondents’ support for the use of force to achieve traditional security objectives declines. Importantly, however, our results suggest that gender egalitarian attitudes exert the strongest suppressive effect on support for the use force among male respondents: rising gender egalitarianism among men effectively closes the gender gap in support for the use of force. Consequently, these results provide microlevel support for the relationship between gender equality and peace found in macrolevel observational analyses.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Review Vol. 20, No.3; Sep 2018: p.345–367
Journal SourceInternational Studies Review Vol: 20 No 3
Key WordsViolence ;  International Conflict ;  Gender Equality


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text