| ID | 162218 |
| Title Proper | Right to strike |
| Other Title Information | a radical view |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gourevitch, Alex |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Workers face a common dilemma when exercising their right to strike. For the worst-off workers to go on strike with some reasonable chance of success, they must use coercive strike tactics like mass pickets and sit-downs. These tactics violate some basic liberties, such as contract, association, and private property, and the laws that protect those liberties. Which has priority, the right to strike or the basic liberties strikers might violate? The answer depends on why the right to strike is justified. In contrast to liberal and social democratic arguments, on the radical view defended here, the right to strike is a right to resist oppression. This oppression is partly a product of the legal protection of basic economic liberties, which explains why the right to strike has priority over these liberties. The radical view thus best explains why workers may use some coercive, even lawbreaking, strike tactics. |
| `In' analytical Note | American Political Science Review Vol. 112, No.4; Nov 2018: p.905-917 |
| Journal Source | American Political Science Review 2018-10 112, 4 |
| Key Words | Right to Strike ; Radical View |