Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1303Hits:21512236Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID163339
Title ProperFinancial inclusion and poverty
Other Title Informationthe role of relative income
LanguageENG
AuthorLinyang, Li
Summary / Abstract (Note)Using the Chinese Household Finance Survey data set, the study shows that concern with relative income significantly stimulates poor households to apply for bank credit. The effect of income comparisons on credit applications can be explained by either a “keeping up with the Joneses” effect, in which the poor seek financing for costly consumption to emulate the wealthy's consumption style and thus suffer persistent poverty, or else a “tunnel” effect, in which the poor are inspired by the wealthy's economic success and enlightened to use credit for investment. Although this study provides no empirical evidence of a “keeping up” effect, it reveals that credit applicants invest significantly more in human capital than non-applicants, and it demonstrates that the “tunnel” effect is the primary incentive for relatively poor households to participate in the credit market. Poor households are capable of using finance to escape from poverty.
`In' analytical NoteChina Economic Review Vol. 52, ; Dec 2018: p.165-191
Journal SourceChina Economic Review 2018-11 52
Key WordsPoverty ;  Financial Inclusion ;  Relative Income ;  Tunnel Effect