| ID | 164361 |
| Title Proper | Discourse, genealogy and methods of text selection in international relations |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Stone Tatum, Dillon |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Discourse analysis, once the purview of critical theories of international politics, has emerged as a mainstream methodology for understanding international relations. While interest in such perspectives has enriched international relations theory, much about the nature of methods—that is, specific empirical processes for the gathering and analysis of evidence—is left ambiguous in this scholarship. Which texts should discourse analyses focus on? And, more practically, how should those texts be chosen? Building on discussions of case study methodology from both qualitative and interpretive social science, this article contributes to theoretical and empirical projects within discourse theory by suggesting a method for text selection: the random selection of texts. I argue that random selection processes are beneficial for discourse analyses that aim to study broad cultural patterns, such as genealogy. Random selection is not simply a means of choosing texts, but also a more comprehensive logic for thinking about the purpose of texts in discourse analysis. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 31, No.3-4; Jun-Aug 2018: p. 344-364 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 31 No 3-4 |
| Key Words | International Relations |