| ID | 164497 |
| Title Proper | Ironic western self |
| Other Title Information | radical and conservative Irony in the ‘losing Turkey’ narrative |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Vuorelma, Johanna |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article focuses on ironic narrative forms in international media and policy debates concerning political developments in Turkey during the era of the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) in the 2000s. More specifically, the article examines the narrative of ‘losing’ Turkey, which has grown in significance during the AKP era, and argues that the metaphor also contains an ironic, self-critical reading that contributes to the debate on the idea of the West. The article advances knowledge concerning different functions of ironic narratives, proposing that we need to distinguish between (1) radical irony and (2) conservative irony. It is argued that radical irony is an outward-looking strategy to advance social justice and to challenge the Western self’s hegemonic representations, while conservative irony is an attempt to re-strengthen the Western self’s hegemony in the international system. The debate on ‘losing’ Turkey is an illustrative case where a Western subject is intersubjectively imagined and narrated with moral and aesthetic preferences. It can be seen as a negotiation about the moral traditions that underpin the West as an imagined and narrated social system. The article argues that the Western self is partly constituted through ironic narrative forms. |
| `In' analytical Note | Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 47, No.2; Jan 2019: p.190–209 |
| Journal Source | Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2019-04 47, 2 |
| Key Words | Turkey ; Narrative ; Irony |