| ID | 164669 |
| Title Proper | When David Fights Goliath |
| Other Title Information | a two-level explanation of small-state role-taking |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Simon, Eszter |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Why do small states sometimes defy the behavioral expectations of powerful allies? Realism would suggest that they would not only ally themselves with more powerful states to ensure their security but would maintain that security through an accommodative strategy toward their protector once an alliance had been formed. Yet, this does not always happen; and the present article, building on Harnisch's (2014) pioneering effort to integrate role theory and the two-level game metaphor, investigates why. It offers and tests the hypothesis that, when small states prioritize their domestic role conceptions in formulating their foreign policy, they defy the behavioral expectations of more powerful allies. The 2014 visa revocation crisis between Hungary and the United States is used to illustrate this process: and contrary to what the literature suggests, the finding is that ego-dominated role-taking in international relations remains possible today even for small states. |
| `In' analytical Note |
Foreign Policy Analysis Vol.15, No.1; Jan 2019: p.
118–135 |
| Journal Source | Foreign Policy Analysis 2019-01 15, 1 |
| Key Words | David Fights Goliath ; Small-State Role-Taking |