| ID | 165198 |
| Title Proper | Revisionist historiography of Britain’s decolonisation conflicts and political science theses of civilian victimisation in counterinsurgency |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Scarinzi, Fausto |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Recent historical research exposed the myth of self-restraint as the distinctive feature of British counterinsurgency during decolonisation. This article shows that the revisionist historiography of British counterinsurgency has important, but unnoticed, implications for political scientists. Specifically, historical scholarship challenges the predictions and causal mechanisms of the main social scientific theses of civilian victimisation in counterinsurgency. Using revisionist historians’ works as a source of data, I test those theses against Britain’s decolonisation conflicts. I find that they do not pass the test convincingly. I conclude that political scientists should be more willing to explore the theoretical implications of new historical evidence on counterinsurgency campaigns. |
| `In' analytical Note | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 30, No.2; Apr 2019: p.421-446 |
| Journal Source | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol: 30 No 2 |
| Key Words | Counterinsurgency ; Historiography ; Theory ; test ; Non-Combatants ; British Decolonisation ; Civilian Victimisation |