Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1720Hits:20919474Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID165549
Title ProperParadox in Polarization? Cross-pressured Representatives and the Missing Incentive to Moderate
LanguageENG
AuthorToll, Benjamin T
Summary / Abstract (Note)Members of the public are often left choosing between two extreme candidates who will not represent the moderate, aggregate, public effectively. Cross-pressured members of the U.S. Congress serve a constituency that votes for the opposite party at the national level. If there is any group of representatives that have an incentive to moderate their voting behavior, it is cross-pressured members. In this article, I show that cross-pressured members are more moderate than the average member of their party. This could provide constraints on rampant partisanship in the form of districts that are comfortable electing a representative of one party and voting for the president of the other. However, I show that these members are significantly less likely to be reelected. Thus a paradox exists in which cross-pressured members who moderate their voting behavior are no more likely to be rewarded for behaving the way citizens claim they want to represent.
`In' analytical NoteWorld Affairs US Vol. 182, No.1; Sprinng 2019: p. 61-96
Journal SourceWorld Affairs US Vol: 182 No 1
Key WordsPolitical Parties ;  United States ;  Moderation ;  Polarization ;  Representation ;  Congress ;  Partisanship ;  House of Representatives ;  Moderate ;  Cross-pressured Congressmen


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text