Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:733Hits:21527127Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID165604
Title ProperMass publicity of Chinese court decisions
Other Title Informationmarket-driven or authoritarian transparency?
LanguageENG
AuthorYingmao Tang and John Zhuang Liu ;  Tang, Yingmao ;  Liu, John Zhuang
Summary / Abstract (Note)is article discusses the online disclosure rates of Chinese court decisions, a measure of judicial transparency, based on a study of over 40
million court decisions disclosed on the designated website of the
Supreme People’s Court of China between 2008 and 2016. We tested
the online disclosure rates in various provinces against three determinants of government transparency suggested by existing theories:
authority, market development level, and public trust in the judiciary.
e results suggest that authority plays a decisive role, and the level of
market development a limited role, in improving judicial transparency.
We reject in part the hypothesis that public trust improves judicial
transparency, or vice versa.
`In' analytical NoteChina Review Vol. 19, No.2; May 2019: p.15–40
Journal SourceChina Review 2019-06 19, 2
Key WordsMass Publicity ;  Chinese Court Decisions ;  Authoritarian Transparency