Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1944Hits:21576320Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID167529
Title ProperTraditional authority and bargaining for legitimacy in dual legitimacy systems
LanguageENG
AuthorMershon, Carol
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper investigates the quest for legitimacy conducted by hereditary, traditional leaders in dual legitimacy systems. We theorise that traditional leaders engage in meta-constitutional bargaining, i.e. bargaining among constitutionally and traditionally defined actors within the meta-constitutional space. This process resembles constitutional bargaining in federations over the institutional balance between the members and centre, and among members. We thus propose a parallel between the theory of federal bargaining, on the one hand, and, on the other, the process of institutional balancing between agents in constitutional and traditional authority structures in dual legitimacy systems. Evidence from narratives of institutional balancing between constitutional and traditional authorities in Southern Africa suggests that actors’ strategies in dual legitimacy systems accord with the framework here. The narratives also disclose that both constitutional and traditional authorities rely on the state's courts for adjudication. The paper enriches social science scholarship on traditional authority, political economy and federalism.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Modern African Studies Vol. 57, No.2; Jun 2019: p.273-296
Journal SourceJournal of Modern African Studies 2019-06 57, 2
Key WordsLegitimacy