| ID | 167622 |
| Title Proper | Difficulties of Combating Inequality in Time |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jenson, Jane |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Scholars have argued that disadvantaged groups face an impossible choice in their efforts to win policies capable of diminishing inequality: whether to emphasize their sameness to or difference from the advantaged group. We analyze three cases from the 1980s and 1990s in which reformers sought to avoid that dilemma and assert groups’ sameness and difference in novel ways: in U.S. policy on biomedical research, in the European Union's initiatives on gender equality, and in Canadian law on Indigenous rights. In each case, however, the reforms adopted ultimately reproduced the sameness/difference dilemma rather than transcended it. To explain why, we show how profound disagreements about both the histories of the groups included in the policy and the place of the policy in a longer historical trajectory of reform either went unrecognized or were actively obscured. Targeted groups came to be attributed a biological or timeless essence, not because this was inevitable, we argue, but because of these failures to historicize inequality. |
| `In' analytical Note | Daedalus Vol. 148, No.3; Summer 2019: p.136-163 |
| Journal Source | Daedalus Vol: 148 No 3 |
| Key Words | Combating Inequality in Time |