| ID | 167638 |
| Title Proper | Asymmetrical rivalry between China and Japan in Africa |
| Other Title Information | to what extent has Sino-Japan rivalry become a global phenomenon? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hirono, Miwa |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | To what extent is China–Japan rivalry a global phenomenon, and what is the nature of the rivalry they engage in outside their own region? Literature on Sino-Japanese rivalry abounds, but it pays scant attention to the relevance of the rivalry outside East Asia. This article argues that Sino-Japanese rivalry has indeed become a global phenomenon, that various forms of the rivalry are evident in Africa, and that they are mostly of an asymmetrical nature. Quantitatively, China’s contribution to Africa is far greater than that of Japan, with the exception of foreign direct investment (FDI). Qualitatively, though, Japan has a stronger sense of the rivalry than China has, revealing a psychological aspect to the asymmetry as well. Contextually, the types of activity that Chinese and Japanese actors carry out in Africa are not necessarily the same, which makes the rivalry all the more asymmetrical. The rivalry has become more apparent recently, not only because of the rise of China but also because of a change in the meaning of ‘Africa’ – from a region of ‘poverty’ and ‘hunger’ to a region of ‘economic opportunities’. That said, Africa – to a greater or lesser degree in each of its countries – still suffers from conflict and instability. As a result, the ability of Japan and China to exert power and influence throughout Africa is somewhat restricted. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 32, No.5; Sep 2019: p.831-862 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 32 No 5 |
| Key Words | Peacekeeping ; Africa ; Foreign Direct Investment ; Aid ; Rivalry ; Sino-Japanese Relations |