Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:4025Hits:20935013Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID168170
Title ProperThat Is Not Intervention
Other Title InformationThat Is Interference with Chinese Characteristics
LanguageENG
AuthorSørensen, Camilla T. N
Note:Statement of Responsibility (Author)New Concepts, Distinctions and Approaches Developing in the Chinese Debate and Foreign and Security Policy Practice
Summary / Abstract (Note)There is among Chinese international relations scholars an intense debate about how China can protect and promote Chinese global presence and interests while at the same time continue to adhere to the principle of non-intervention. New concepts, distinctions and approaches are developing as the debate progresses. The current Chinese foreign and security policy practice reflects a more flexible and pragmatic Chinese interpretation – and implementation – of the principle of non-intervention with different degrees and types of intervention. This article explores the search for “legitimate great power intervention” characterizing both the debate among Chinese international relations scholars and the current Chinese foreign and security policy practice, and uses this case as the departure point for a more general discussion of the drivers of change – and continuity – in Chinese foreign and security policy.
`In' analytical NoteChina Quarterly  , No.239; Sep 2019: p.594-613
Journal SourceChina Quarterly NO 239
Key WordsChina ;  Non-Intervention ;  Chinese Foreign and Security Policy ;  Legitimate Great Power Intervention ;  Evolving Debate and Practice


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text