Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:427Hits:21056560Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID168809
Title ProperTo Shock the Conscience
Other Title InformationRhetoric in Death Penalty Judgements of the Supreme Court of India
LanguageENG
AuthorSaikumar, Rajgopal
Summary / Abstract (Note)The dominant paradigm in scholarship on death penalty law in India is doctrinal and empirical. There is an equally indispensable need for a third approach that focuses on the rhetoric of and in death penalty judgements. In the first part of the paper I argue why such an approach is necessary, and in the second part I instantiate this by a close reading of narrative techniques and rhetorical devices deployed in two recent Supreme Court judgements. I show the use of antirrhetic speech, ekphrasis and the ‘reality effect’ woven into the narrative of the taboo on incest, peopled with characters such as ‘diabolical monsters’ plotting ‘sinister designs’. Embedded in these narratives are judges who see themselves as reconstituting a community on the verge of breakdown. In this circular operation, monsters are linguistically created, and the monstrosity of the criminal is then used as a justification for death. Yet such a monster cannot be a wholly non-human figure because intent is necessary for fixing legal responsibility.
`In' analytical NoteSouth Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies Vol. 42, No.4; Aug 2019: p.694-710
Journal SourceSouth Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 2019-08 42, 4
Key WordsEvidence ;  Rhetoric ;  Narrative ;  Death Penalty ;  Supreme Court of India ;  Antirrhesis ;  Collective Conscience ;  Ekphrasis