| ID | 169463 |
| Title Proper | Models of scientific and technological review for the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Evans, Nicholas G |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Science and technology (S&T) review is key to anticipating developments in the life sciences that may benefit or run contrary to the aims of the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. It serves as a mechanism for both preparing against novel biological threats and identifying the best opportunities for developing and sharing the life sciences to the fullest extent. In the age of rapidly advancing biotechnology, S&T review needs to be wide ranging, involve a diverse set of inputs, and be transparent about its methods and data. This viewpoint considers four models of S&T review and their capacity to respond to the challenge of the life sciences: standing advisory boards; ad hoc working groups; peer review; and wikis. It then identifies a hybrid model that is suitably broad, diverse, and transparent. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 26, No.3-4; Jun-Jul 2019: p.351-366 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol: 26 No 3-4 |
| Key Words | Nonproliferation ; Transparency ; Dual Use ; Biological Weapon ; Science and Technology Review |