Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2644Hits:21006821Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID169912
Title ProperTerrorism Analysis and Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Other Title Informationthe missing element
LanguageENG
AuthorLutz, James M ;  Ulmschneider, Georgia Wralstad
Summary / Abstract (Note)The decision in the case of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project raised important issues about civil liberties in the United States (2010), including freedom of speech and freedom of association, in relation to U.S. foreign policy actions. While the decision has the potential to infringe on certain liberties, the decision itself was based on very limited information on the nature of terrorism, the foreign terrorist organizations involved, and the processes by which terrorist groups can be induced to peacefully re-enter domestic political systems. There are also concerns about what can be the arbitrary designation of groups as foreign terrorist organizations. These issues raise serious questions about the role of the Supreme Court in the overall political system and judgments in cases involving terrorism and foreign policy.
`In' analytical NoteTerrorism and Political Violence Vol. 31, No.4-6; Jul-Dec 2019: p.800-816
Journal SourceTerrorism and Political Violence Vol: 31 No 4-6
Key WordsCivil liberties ;  U.S. Foreign Policy ;  Foreign Terrorist Organizations ;  Holder V ;  Humanitarian Law Project ;  U.S. Supreme Court


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text