Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:869Hits:21039652Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID173880
Title ProperResearch as a military mascot
Other Title Informationpolitical ethnography and counterinsurgency in southern Thailand
LanguageENG
AuthorStreicher, Ruth
Summary / Abstract (Note)The term ‘political ethnography’ has been used to describe a recent trend whereby political scientists, including scholars of security studies and international relations, increasingly deploy fieldwork to explore a variety of political arenas. This article challenges a one-dimensional understanding of political ethnography that sidelines the politics activated in an ethnographic research process and instead calls for political ethnographers to self-reflectively analyse their own positionality in terms of imperial complicity. It discusses experiences of researching counterinsurgency practices in southern Thailand and outlines different dimensions through which counterinsurgents positioned the author as a ‘military mascot’. These include assumptions about the Western and Christian identity of the researcher as well as ideas about the author’s ability to produce objective ‘facts’ in reporting a presumably peaceful military mission. The article concludes by reflecting on the problematic alliance between political science and imperial military projects of counterinsurgency, arguing that the lack of discussion about this affinity constitutes one of the conditions that facilitate the ‘mascotting’ of political ethnographers with military interlocutors.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Dialogue Vol. 51, No.1; Feb 2020: p.23–38
Journal SourceSecurity Dialogue Vol 51 No 1
Key WordsCounterinsurgency ;  Knowledge Production ;  Southern Thailand ;  Mascots ;  Political Ethnography ;  Imperial Complicity


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text