Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2703Hits:21029184Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID174447
Title ProperAccountability for the Local Economy at All Levels of Government in United States Elections
LanguageENG
AuthorChristopher Warshaw ;  Warshaw, Christopher ;  De Benedictis-Kessner, Justin
Summary / Abstract (Note)Retrospective voting is a crucial component of democratic accountability. A large literature on retrospective voting in the United States finds that the president’s party is rewarded in presidential elections for strong economic performance and punished for weak performance. By contrast, there is no clear consensus about whether politicians are held accountable for the local economy at other levels of government, nor how voters react to the economy in a complex system of multilevel responsibility. In this study, we use administrative data on county-level economic conditions from 1969 to 2018 and election results across multiple levels of government to examine the effect of the local economy on elections for local, state, and federal offices in the United States. We find that the president’s party is held accountable for economic performance across nearly all levels of government. We also find that incumbents are held accountable for the economy in U.S. House and gubernatorial elections. Our findings have broad implications for literatures on representation, accountability, and elections.
`In' analytical NoteAmerican Political Science Review Vol. 114, No.3; Aug 2020: p.660 - 676
Journal SourceAmerican Political Science Review 2020-08 114, 3
Key WordsLocal Economy ;  Government in United States Elections