| ID | 174453 |
| Title Proper | Corruption Information and Vote Share |
| Other Title Information | a meta-analysis and lessons for experimental design |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Incerti, Trevor |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Debate persists on whether voters hold politicians accountable for corruption. Numerous experiments have examined whether informing voters about corrupt acts of politicians decreases their vote share. Meta-analysis demonstrates that corrupt candidates are punished by zero percentage points across field experiments, but approximately 32 points in survey experiments. I argue this discrepancy arises due to methodological differences. Small effects in field experiments may stem partially from weak treatments and noncompliance, and large effects in survey experiments are likely from social desirability bias and the lower and hypothetical nature of costs. Conjoint experiments introduce hypothetical costly trade-offs, but it may be best to interpret results in terms of realistic sets of characteristics rather than marginal effects of particular characteristics. These results suggest that survey experiments may provide point estimates that are not representative of real-world voting behavior. However, field experimental estimates may also not recover the “true” effects due to design decisions and limitations.
|
| `In' analytical Note | American Political Science Review Vol. 114, No.3; Aug 2020: p.761 - 774 |
| Journal Source | American Political Science Review 2020-08 114, 3 |
| Key Words | Meta-Analysis ; Corruption Information ; Vote Share |