| ID | 175394 |
| Title Proper | WHO and the COVID-19 Pandemic |
| Other Title Information | less reform, more innovation |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lee, Kelley ; Kelley Lee 1 and Julianne Piper 1 ; Piper, Julianne |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Public displays of gratitude around the world, championing frontline health workers as heroes during the COVID-19 pandemic, have contrasted sharply with the criticisms directed toward the World Health Organization (WHO). As the “directing and coordinating body for international health work,” the UN specialized agency has arguably been at the front line of the front line, gathering essential epidemic intelligence, convening scientific research collaborations, and compiling technical guidelines on diagnostics, clinical care, prevention, and mitigation strategies. While playing this unique role, including regular media briefings throughout the pandemic, WHO officials have fielded questions about its performance against the backdrop of relentless increases in coronavirus infections and deaths worldwide. The withdrawal of funding and membership by the US government,1 and resolution adopted by Member States at the 73rd World Health Assembly “to initiate … [an] impartial, independent and comprehensive evaluation … [of] the WHO-coordinated international health response to COVID-19,”2 reflects a concerning loss of confidence in the WHO at a time when the world needs it the most. So, how did we get here and what is the way forward? |
| `In' analytical Note | Global Governance Vol. 26, No.4; Oct-Dec 2020: p.523–533 |
| Journal Source | Global Governance Vol: 26 No 4 |
| Key Words | WHO ; Covid-19 Pandemic |