Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:3988Hits:20956194Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID178762
Title ProperDesert Shield of the Republic? a Realist Case for Abandoning the Middle East
LanguageENG
AuthorPorter, Patrick ;  Blagden, David
Summary / Abstract (Note)Political realists disagree on what America should “do” and “be” in the Middle East. All are skeptical toward extravagant geopolitical projects to transform the region. Yet they differ over whether hegemony in the Gulf and its wider environs are worth the substantial investment of blood and treasure. Hegemonic “primacy realism” finds the commitment effective and affordable, and that Washington should stay to stabilize the region to ensure a favorable concentration of power. There is an alternative “shield of the republic” realism, however, which views the pursuit of armed supremacy in the Middle East as harming political order at home, reducing security more than generating it, and costing too much for too little gain. It involves interests that are either manageable from a remove or largely generated by being there in the first place. In this article, we lay out the latter position, arguing that the unruly Gulf is increasingly peripheral to US national interests. The region is losing its salience grand strategically, entanglement and continuous war damage republican liberties, and the calculus of whether continued hegemony is “worth it” has shifted decisively toward the downside. The time for abandonment has come.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Studies Vol. 30, No.1; Jan-Mar 2021: p.5-48
Journal SourceSecurity Studies Vol: 30 No 1
Key WordsMiddle East ;  Abandoning ;  US National Interests


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text