Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:4018Hits:20976684Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID178981
Title ProperWhen Conflicts Do Not Overspill
Other Title Informationthe Case of Jordan
LanguageENG
AuthorNesser, Petter ;  Gråtrud, Henrik
Summary / Abstract (Note)How can vulnerable states adjacent to countries embroiled in civil war avoid conflict contagion? Jordan has all the classic attributes highlighted in the literature as creating vulnerabilities susceptible to spillover. It adjoins Syria and Iraq where jihadists have operated freely. It has a weak economy, refugees pouring in from adjacent conflicts and is home to hundreds—if not thousands—of jihadists. Moreover, jihadists consider the Jordanian regime to be traitors—who conspire with the enemies of Islam—and they want to replace it with an Islamic state. However, as we show, very few jihadist attacks have happened in Jordan. We test three hypotheses for the limited spillover. Our analysis suggests a state policy that we dub “calibrated repression” is the most significant explanation. This means that Jordan protects against spillover by repressing jihadist attempts at infiltrating the kingdom and clamping down on local terrorist cells linked to the Islamic State while keeping other domestic jihadist elements in check through co-optation. The regime restrains the use of force against less acute threats and displays some leniency towards radicals when the situation allows. Our findings speak to the broader literature on spillover and offer insights into the understudied topic of mechanisms limiting spillover in high-risk environments.
`In' analytical NotePerspectives on Politics Vol. 19, No.2; Jun 2021: p.492 - 506
Journal SourcePerspectives on Politics 2021-06 19, 2
Key WordsCivil War ;  Conflict Contagion ;  Case of Jordan