ID | 180223 |
Title Proper | Trade Rage |
Other Title Information | Audience Costs and International Trade |
Language | ENG |
Author | Casler, Don ; Clark, Richard |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Politicians frequently issue public threats to manipulate tariffs but only sometimes follow through. This behavior theoretically ought to generate audience costs. We therefore test the validity of audience costs in trade war settings through a vignette-based survey experiment. The vignettes describe a hypothetical situation involving the U.S. and a second country (China, Canada, or unspecified) with whom the U.S. has a trade deficit. The president (Democrat, Republican, or unspecified) either maintains the status quo, threatens to impose tariffs and backs down, or threatens to impose tariffs and follows through. Our findings highlight differences between security and trade conflict when it comes to audience costs and presidential approval. While Americans sanction the president for issuing a threat to raise tariffs, they generally support backing down. Regression modeling and text analysis of a free response question from our surveys suggest this is because consumers are wary of paying the costs of tariffs. |
`In' analytical Note | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 65, No.6; Jul 2021: p.1098-1130 |
Journal Source | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 65 No 6 |
Key Words | Public Opinion ; Trade ; Tariffs ; Audience Costs |