| ID | 180571 |
| Title Proper | Boundary work and normativity in research communication across time |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Andersson, Mette |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper looks at how research communication in Norwegian migration and diversity research has changed over time. The main themes in the analysis are researchers’ motivations to enter the field and their experiences of, and reactions to, critique from colleagues and other audiences. Theory about credibility contests and boundary work on the interface of the academia and media, along with ideas about explicit and implicit normativity, inform the analysis. A main conclusion is that, as the field has matured, contests over normativity have changed from internal contests over implicit normativity to external charges of explicit normativity. The empirical analysis builds on 31 interviews with Norwegian researchers about their experiences of, and views on, public research communication in newspapers, social media, radio, TV and face-to-face panel debates. The interviewed researchers are of different age, gender, and ethnicity and they work in 10 different universities and research institutes across Norway. |
| `In' analytical Note | Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power Vol. 28, No.5; Oct 2021: p.598-614 |
| Journal Source | Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 2021-10 28, 5 |
| Key Words | Science Studies ; Boundary Work ; Research Communication ; Implicit Normativity ; Explicit Normativity ; Migration and Diversity |