| ID | 181742 |
| Title Proper | FARC’s Pursuit of “Taking Power” |
| Other Title Information | Insurgent Social Contracts, the Drug Trade and Appeals to Eudaemonic Legitimation |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Phelan, Alexandra |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper argues that eudaemonic legitimation is a useful tool in understanding how insurgencies seek to justify their “effectiveness” and “performance” vis-à-vis the state in order to enhance authority and mobilise support for their strategic objectives. By examining primary FARC documents, conference and plenary findings, and select interviews with former and active FARC, ELN and M-19 members, it demonstrates how FARC constructed social contracts and integrated illicit financing into its operations as a strategy to appeal to its eudaemonic legitimation in its areas of proto-state influence, in turn aiming to mobilise support and consolidate a full-spectrum normative system. “Effectiveness” in FARC’s strategic approach through rule-setting allowed the organisation to expand to control significant portions of Colombian territory, which to a degree impacted positively on social mobilisation and challenged the government’s legitimacy by consolidating power structures in areas where there was a lack of government authority. FARC further appealed to social and economic “performance” by using revenue from its fundraising activities through engagement in the coca trade and kidnap for ransom to not only strengthen its military capacity, but also implement social initiatives and provide material goods. In turn, FARC was able to develop zones of security through the creation of social contracts in which stable economic practices were able to solidify, contributing in its effectiveness in providing proto-state authority and allowing for insurgent expansion. |
| `In' analytical Note | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 44, No.10-12; Oct-Dec 2021: p.971-993 |
| Journal Source | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol: 44 No 10-12 |
| Key Words | Drug Trade ; FARC’s Pursuit ; Insurgent Social Contracts ; Eudaemonic Legitimation |