Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:497Hits:21753411Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID182703
Title ProperNuclear Coercion, Crisis Bargaining, and The Sino-Soviet Border Conflict of 1969
LanguageENG
AuthorCho, Hyun-Binn
Summary / Abstract (Note)The claim that President Donald Trump’s “fire and fury” pressure campaign coerced North Korea to return to the bargaining table has renewed debates about coercion among nuclear powers. This article contributes to these debates by refining our understanding of the 1969 Sino-Soviet border crisis. Drawing on Romanian archival documents and Chinese-language sources, this article challenges the assertion that Soviet nuclear threats coerced the Chinese to return to the bargaining table. Further, it explains China’s otherwise puzzling intransigence when border negotiations resumed. After China’s leaders agreed to return to the bargaining table, they became fearful of a Soviet nuclear attack and fled Beijing; despite this fear, however, the Chinese resisted a border deal for decades. Why did the fear of a Soviet nuclear attack fail to compel the Chinese to accept a border deal? By improving our understanding of the 1969 crisis, this article sheds new light on the conditions under which nuclear compellence succeeds.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Studies Vol. 30, No.4; Aug-Sep 2021: p. 550-577
Journal SourceSecurity Studies Vol: 30 No 4
Key WordsCrisis Bargaining ;  Nuclear Coercion ;  Sino-Soviet Border Conflict of 1969


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text