| ID | 183901 |
| Title Proper | Swedish Covid-19 strategy and voluntary compliance |
| Other Title Information | Failed securitisation or constitutional security management? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Larsson, Oscar Leonard |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The Covid-19 pandemic that emerged in the spring of 2020 caused severe political, social, and economic turmoil throughout the world. In spite of early warning signals from the World Health Organization, countries struggled to shape their policy responses and countermeasures for curtailing the spread of the virus while also minimising the damage that any restrictions would inflict on the health and well-being of society at large. While some countries have adopted strict regulations and extraordinary measures after declaring ‘states of exception’ and ‘national emergencies’, others have relied upon expert recommendations and individual responsibility. Sweden is viewed as having adopted one of the latter type of approaches in that it places the responsibility for social distancing upon the individual. Is this an instance of a failed ‘securitisation’ process, or rather a sensible constitutional and political response to a severe security event? This article presents an in-depth analysis of the Swedish strategy for coping with Covid-19, arguing that this case illustrates that security management in a democratic state should direct greater attention to rule following in accordance with a logic of appropriateness rather than the rule breaking envisaged by securitisation theory. |
| `In' analytical Note | European Journal of International Security Vol. 7, No.2; May 2022: p.226 - 247 |
| Journal Source | European Journal of International Security Vol: 7 No 2 |
| Key Words | Securitisation ; Pandemic ; COVID-19 ; Logic-of-Appropriateness ; Swedish Corona Strategy |