| ID | 184289 |
| Title Proper | Psychology of online political hostility |
| Other Title Information | a comprehensive, cross-national test of the mismatch hypothesis |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Petersen, Michael Bang ; BOR, ALEXANDER |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Why are online discussions about politics more hostile than offline discussions? A popular answer argues that human psychology is tailored for face-to-face interaction and people’s behavior therefore changes for the worse in impersonal online discussions. We provide a theoretical formalization and empirical test of this explanation: the mismatch hypothesis. We argue that mismatches between human psychology and novel features of online environments could (a) change people’s behavior, (b) create adverse selection effects, and (c) bias people’s perceptions. Across eight studies, leveraging cross-national surveys and behavioral experiments (total N = 8,434), we test the mismatch hypothesis but only find evidence for limited selection effects. Instead, hostile political discussions are the result of status-driven individuals who are drawn to politics and are equally hostile both online and offline. Finally, we offer initial evidence that online discussions feel more hostile, in part, because the behavior of such individuals is more visible online than offline. |
| `In' analytical Note | American Political Science Review Vol. 116, No.1; Feb 2022: p.1 - 18 |
| Journal Source | American Political Science Review Vol: 116 No 1 |
| Key Words | Psychology of Online Political Hostility |