Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:486Hits:21752773Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID184296
Title ProperAt the Borders of the Body Politic
Other Title InformationFetal Citizens, Pregnant Migrants, and Reproductive Injustices in Immigration Detention
LanguageENG
AuthorLEACH, BRITTANY R.
Summary / Abstract (Note)To analyze intersecting power relations in reproductive and immigration politics, I examine Garza v. Hargan (an appellate case regarding unaccompanied immigrant minors’ abortion rights) alongside systemic injustices in immigration detention (e.g., exposure to miscarriage risks, coerced sterilization, shackling). These injustices, I argue, emerge from conflicts and compromises over fetal citizenship within the American radical right. Although pro-life and anti-immigrant discourses assume opposing logics of citizenship, respectively interpreting immigrants’ fetuses as “fetal citizens” or “anchor babies,” these contradictions are neutralized by two techniques. Debilitation (systematic degradation of a disposable population) enables the appearance of fetal protection to coexist with de facto exposure to death, injury, and risk. Paralegality (quasi-legal policy making by enforcement agents) allows situational shifts in the meaning of fetal citizenship and adjustments to the pro-life/anti-immigrant compromise. Both obscure culpability for reproductive injustice, reinforce interlocking oppressions, and control women’s bodies in order to control the body politic’s demographic future.
`In' analytical NoteAmerican Political Science Review Vol. 116, No.1; Feb 2022: p.116 - 130
Journal SourceAmerican Political Science Review Vol: 116 No 1
Key WordsImmigration detention ;  Pregnant Migrants ;  Reproductive Injustices


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text