| ID | 186181 |
| Title Proper | Between ‘coercive league’ and ‘consultative league’ |
| Other Title Information | a reappraisal of debates surrounding the ‘reform’ of the League of Nations |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Obiya, Shunsuke |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article addresses debates surrounding the reform of the League of Nations from the viewpoint of Britain and China. They focused on the pros and cons of collective security because the failure of the League to stop Japanese invasion of Manchuria and Italian invasion of Abyssinia threatened the collapse of the League. There were two contrasting visions in debates, the ‘Coercive League’ and the ‘Consultative League’. The ‘Coercive League’ was the course to reinforce collective security to prevent further aggression. Conversely, the ‘Consultative League’ argument was to weaken collective security and induce Germany, Italy, and Japan to cooperate with the League. Deliberations took place in both the Council, in which great powers exerted a strong presence, and the Assembly, in which small powers made their voices heard. Therefore, this article deals with Britain as an example of a great power and China as one of a small power.
|
| `In' analytical Note | International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 21, No.3; 2021: p.465–492 |
| Journal Source | International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol: 21 No 3 |
| Key Words | Collective Security ; China ; Britain ; Reform of the League of Nation ; Coercive League |