Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:565Hits:21317287Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID188268
Title ProperISR versus ISTAR
Other Title Informationa Conceptual Crisis in British Military Intelligence
LanguageENG
AuthorDavies, Philip H J
Summary / Abstract (Note)Between 2009 and 2011, there was an intense debate in UK, Canadian, and Australian military intelligence circles regarding two putatively competing doctrinal concepts, the U.S.-originated “intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance” and the United Kingdom’s “intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance.” The inclusion, or not, of target acquisition proved a flashpoint for a wider and deeper range of existing concerns about the organizational and doctrinal relationships between intelligence and operations in a military command staff. These, in turn, reflected a more fundamental and ongoing transformation in that relationship arising from “revolution in military affairs” during the 1990s. The article traces the debate up to its premature termination by fiat in 2011 and concludes that these issues remain to be properly addressed in UK and allied intelligence doctrine.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence Vol. 35, No.1; Spring 2022: p.73-100
Journal SourceInternational Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence Vol: 35 No 1
Key WordsBritish Military Intelligence ;  ISR versus ISTAR


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text