Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1274Hits:21483724Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID188628
Title ProperAmerican Cold War Strategy and the Absence of “Swift and Effective Retribution” for the 1983 Marine Barracks Bombing
LanguageENG
AuthorCummins, Nicholas
Summary / Abstract (Note)Ronald Reagan entered the White House in 1981 as the president who promised to confront the foreign enemies of the United States. Whilst the Soviet Union remained the single greatest threat to the United States, the 1979 hostage crisis in Iran dramatically raised concerns over international terrorism. Reagan’s approach to this threat was unequivocal – those responsible would be subject to “swift and effective retribution”. In 1983, one of the most devastating acts of international terrorism in American history confronted Reagan – the bombing of the Marine barracks in Lebanon. Despite Reagan’s earlier pledge, those believed to have been responsible for this attack – Iran and its surrogate, Hezbollah – avoided punishment. This analysis explains the discrepancy between Reagan’s rhetoric and his actions by examining how strategic imperatives related to the Cold War helped deter a military reprisal against both Iran and Hezbollah.
`In' analytical NoteDiplomacy and Statecraft Vol. 33, No.2; Jun 2022: p.330-354
Journal SourceDiplomacy and Statecraft Vol: 33 No 2
Key WordsAmerican Cold War Strategy ;  Swift and Effective Retribution ;  1983 Marine Barracks Bombing


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text